Apparently, Adam A7X and Focal CMS 65 are the studio monitor speaker models available in your price range. Both are powered speakers that have been designed for near-field monitoring. A studio monitor speaker for near-field monitoring must be as accurate and clean as possible, because the job listens to the audio reproduction directly in order to reduce the effects of the room acoustics. So, between Adam A7X and Focal CMS 65, which one is the best? Below, we are going to see the comparisons between the two models, So, continue reading!
Both Adam A7X and Focal CMS 65 are generally compact and portable, but Adam A7X is slightly smaller and lighter than Focal CMS 65. Adam A7X comes with a ported design, featuring the 2” X-ART tweeter and a 7” woofer armed by a 1.5” voice coil. The cone is made of the combination of carbon, Rohacell, and glass fiber. The construction is solid and rugged. The woofer is powered by a 100W amp whereas the tweeter is powered by a 50W amp.
On the other hand, Focal CMS 65 may look slightly sleeker due to having a stylishly curved body. It features a 6.5” woofer and a 1” tweeter. The drivers are made of poly-glass. The woofer is powered by a 100W amp whereas the tweeter is powered by a 60W amp.
Comparing the performance of these two speakers, we must say that Adam A7X is slightly better than Focal CMS 65. Focal CMS 65 has a frequency response range of 45 Hz – 28 kHz. The audio reproduction is generally warm and decent, with crisp sounds across the frequencies. Having a slightly more powerful amp, the maximum SPL handling is also higher at 112 dB – which means that it can deliver slightly higher volume levels. On the other hand, though, Adam A7X boasts a frequency response range of 42 Hz – 50 kHz. As you can see, the range is much wider. As the effect, the sound quality is also enhanced. The bass is deeper and more accurate, without muddling the mid and highs. The midrange and treble are crisper and cleaner, as well as more detailed. The maximum SPL handling is 106 dB, but Adam A7X’s detailed output is certainly very useful for helping you monitor the flaws in a recording.
Adam A7X Vs Focal CMS 65
|Adam A7X||Focal CMS 65|
|Key Features||General Size: Near-fieldSystem type: ActiveConfiguration: 2-wayDriversLow-frequency driver: 7"Mid-frequency driver: Not applicableHigh-frequency driver: 2"Full-range driver: Not applicableDriver type: Carbon FiberSound Frequency response: 42Hz 50kHzMax peak SPL: 106 dBAmplifier class: A/BOutput power: 75WOnboard Features Input connectors: XLR, RCAStandby mode: Info not availableAcoustic space control: NoPower indicator: YesOther Width: 8" Height: 13.5" Depth: 11" Weight: 20.3||General Size: Near-field System type: Active Configuration: 2-wayDrivers Low-frequency driver: 6.5" Mid-frequency driver: Not applicable High-frequency driver: 1" Full-range driver: Not applicable Driver type: PolyglassSound Frequency response: 45Hz 28kHz Max peak SPL: 112 dB Amplifier class: A/B Output power: 100WOnboard Features Input connectors: XLR, RCA Standby mode: No Acoustic space control: Yes Power indicator: YesOther Width: 9.5" Height: 14.1" Depth: 9.1" Weight: 23 lb.|
|Ratings||4.3 out of 5.0 stars||4.2 out of 5.0 stars|
|Best Deal*||Save Money Please click here||Save Money Please click here|
NOTE : Product prices, availability, ratings and save money information are accurate as of the date/time indicated on post time (as seen right bellow the tittle) and are subject to change. Any price, ratings, availability and save money information displayed on Amazon Site or Headphone Authority at the time of purchase will apply to the purchase of this product.
We recommend you to choose Adam A7X. The audio output is more accurate and detailed, making it very effective for monitoring purposes. However, if you are the type who prefer a warmer sound character, Focal CMS 65 can be a good choice for casual music listening.